goodreads: (Default)
Title: Mind Games
Author: Nora Roberts
Genre: Suspense
Rating: 5/5
# pages: Audiobook ~15hrs
Date read: August 2024

As they do each June, the Foxes have driven the winding roads of Appalachia to drop off their children for a two-week stay at their grandmother’s. Here, twelve-year-old Thea can run free and breathe in the smells of pine and fresh bread and Grammie’s handmade candles. But as her parents head back to suburban Virginia, they have no idea they’re about to cross paths with a ticking time bomb.

Back in Kentucky, Thea and her grandmother Lucy both awaken from the same nightmare. And though the two have never discussed the special kind of sight they share, they know as soon as their tearful eyes meet that something terrible has happened.

The kids will be staying with Grammie now in Redbud Hollow, and thanks to Thea’s vision, their parents’ killer will spend his life in supermax. Over time, Thea will make friends, build a career, find love. But that ability to see into minds and souls still lurks within her, and though Grammie calls it a gift, it feels more like a curse―because the inmate who shattered her childhood has the same ability. Thea can hear his twisted thoughts and witness his evil acts from miles away. He knows it, and hungers for vengeance. A long, silent battle will be waged between them―and eventually bring them face to face, and head to head…


Impossible to put down and left me utterly book-hungover once I finished it.

This is one of Nora Roberts' best books. I loved the characters, I loved the relationships, I loved the setting, and the foreshadowing didn't bother me too much, as it happened so early in the book.

I loved seeing Thea grow up and come into her powers - loved her relationship with her grandmother, her brother and her friends. I adored Bunk and Bray - he reminded me a lot of Boots from Suzanne Collins' "Gregor the Overlander" in his excitements over any and all animals.

The conflict between Ty and Thea was understandable but annoying because it would have been so easily fixed with communication. Fortunately it wasn't allowed to linger, and was resolved quicker than I had feared. And I really appreciated the way Ray was handled -- perhaps not the final outcome (which didn't altogether make sense to me), but the fact that he wasn't as all-powerful as Nora Roberts' villains sometimes appear to be.

Absolutely loved it!
goodreads: (Default)
Title: Go Tell the Bees That I am Gone (Outlander #9)
Author: Diana Gabaldon
Genre: Historical fiction
Rating: 3/5
# pages: 902
Date read: August 2024

It is 1779 and Claire and Jamie are at last reunited with their daughter, Brianna, her husband, Roger, and their children on Fraser’s Ridge. Having the family together is a dream the Frasers had thought impossible.

Yet even in the North Carolina backcountry, the effects of war are being felt. Tensions in the Colonies are great and local feelings run hot enough to boil Hell’s tea-kettle. Jamie knows loyalties among his tenants are split and it won’t be long until the war is on his doorstep.

Brianna and Roger have their own worry: that the dangers that provoked their escape from the twentieth century might catch up to them. Sometimes they question whether risking the perils of the 1700s—among them disease, starvation, and an impending war—was indeed the safer choice for their family.

Not so far away, young William Ransom is still coming to terms with the discovery of his true father’s identity—and thus his own—and Lord John Grey has reconciliations to make, and dangers to meet . . . on his son’s behalf, and his own.

Meanwhile, the Revolutionary War creeps ever closer to Fraser’s Ridge. And with the family finally together, Jamie and Claire have more at stake than ever before.


This book suffers from having a too-famous author and therefore not a critical enough editor. I actually really liked it, and had the rating been tighter, I could easily have given it four stars. But long book is LONG and it didn't need to be. There were SO many plotlines that could have been left out, and it shows.

I think one of the main issues is that Gabaldon writes from too many POVs. The earlier books didn't have that problem, and were a lot tighter for it. I don't care enough for neither Ian, Bree/Roger nor William to read chapter upon chapter about their ongoings. It made sense in "Drums of Autumn" when we had the "then and now" timelines, but not really any longer. I didn't mind the chapters from Jamie's POV as much - probably because those still took place at Frasier's Ridge, and that is what I was interested in reading about!

All in all, I liked the first half the best. Despite everything, the first half read as a comfort book, and I loved reading about the going-ons at Fraiser's Ridge. I loved reading about the every-day life there - the cooking, the farming, the doctoring, the family life - everything! But of course it wouldn't be an Outlander novel without some sort of trouble, so trouble we had -- although FORTUNATELY not to the extend of some of the earlier novels. Diana Gabaldon has learned her lesson and isn't being quite as hard on her darlings as we've seen previously. For which I'm grateful! That did get old rather fast.

As per usual, there were still threads left hanging, so once again I will finish my review off by saying - I hope the next book is the last one. Not because I don't still enjoy the series, but because it deserves a fitting end, rather than to be drawn out ad nauseum.
goodreads: (Default)
Title: Brothers Lionheart
Author: Astrid Lindgren
Genre: Childrens
Rating: 1.5/5
# pages: 228
Date read: August 2024

The story of the two brothers, Jonatan and Karl Lionheart as they go on exciting adventures in Nangijala - "the country on the other side of the stars".


I really, really don't get how this is marketed as a children's book. It should come with a ton of trigger warnings - for violence, death, murder, suicide.

As a rule, I love Astrid Lindgren's books, but this is the exception that proves the rule. I read it as a teen, and remember not liking it much, but didn't remember much of the book at all, so when I recently finished another book that reminded me of it, I figured I'd give it another shot, and see if it really was as terrible as I seemed to remember.

Reader - it was worse.

Just an all-around unpleasant book, and I really have NO idea what kind of point Astrid Lindgren was trying to make. And the worst thing is - it would have been SO easy to improve. Change a few details in the last chapter, and voila! You'd have a very sweet fantasy novel instead.

But no - she had to go the murder-suicide route. I don't get it at all.
goodreads: (Default)
Title: Blackout & All Clear
Author: Connie Willis
Genre: Sci-fi, historical fiction
Rating: 4.5/5
# pages: 512p (19hrs), 643p (24hrs)
Date read: February 2012, September 2015, August 2024

In Blackout, award-winning author Connie Willis returned to the time-traveling future of 2060 - the setting for several of her most celebrated works - and sent three Oxford historians to World War II England: Michael Davies, intent on observing heroism during the Miracle of Dunkirk; Merope Ward, studying children evacuated from London; and Polly Churchill, posing as a shopgirl in the middle of the Blitz. But when the three become unexpectedly trapped in 1940, they struggle not only to find their way home but to survive as Hitler's bombers attempt to pummel London into submission.

Now the situation has grown even more dire. Small discrepancies in the historical record seem to indicate that one or all of them have somehow affected the past, changing the outcome of the war. The belief that the past can be observed but never altered has always been a core belief of time-travel theory - but suddenly it seems that the theory is horribly, tragically wrong.

Meanwhile, in 2060 Oxford, the historians' supervisor, Mr. Dunworthy, and seventeen-year-old Colin Templer, who nurses a powerful crush on Polly, are engaged in a frantic and seemingly impossible struggle of their own - to find three missing needles in the haystack of history.


An absolutely amazing series, but I am very glad I knew from the set out that "All Clear" was one book split out in two volumes, rather than two individual books. I would have been furious with the cliffhanger at the end of "Blackout" if I hadn't known this in advance. For the same reason I am going to review the two books as one.

In a word - I loved it, and it brought back everything I had loved about Connie Willis' writing in "The Doomsday Book". I liked the way the different plotlines intertwined and was chuffed to spot some of the links before they were made obvious. But as usual, trying to figure out the theory behind time travel gave me a headache ;)

I had serious problems putting the books down, and finished the last one over the weekend. I do recommend reading the fanfic "Nothing Lost" by Drayton as well though, as it provides a very likely explanation for some of the questions I still had after finishing it.

Profile

goodreads: (Default)
goodreads

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011 121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 22nd, 2025 14:48
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios